HTMX: Server-Side HTML for the Modern Web

HTMX: Server-Side HTML for the Modern Web

HTMX challenges a core assumption of modern web development: that dynamic web interfaces require JavaScript frameworks managing state and rendering on the client. HTMX takes the opposite approach — let the server render HTML, and use lightweight attributes to make that HTML interactive.

It's not for every project. When it fits, it's remarkably elegant.

What Is HTMX?

HTMX is a small (~14KB) JavaScript library that extends HTML with attributes that enable AJAX requests, CSS transitions, WebSockets, and Server-Sent Events — all directly in your HTML markup.

The core idea: instead of writing JavaScript to fetch data and manipulate the DOM, you annotate HTML elements with HTMX attributes that describe what to do when events happen.

A basic example — a button that loads content:

<button hx-get="/api/content" hx-target="#result">
  Load Content
</button>

<div id="result">
  <!-- Content loaded here -->
</div>

When clicked, HTMX sends a GET request to /api/content and swaps the response HTML into #result. No JavaScript written. Your server responds with HTML fragments, not JSON.

The Philosophy: Hypermedia-Driven Applications

HTMX is built around the hypermedia model of the web — the idea that the server controls application state and sends HTML representing that state, rather than sending raw data that client-side JavaScript transforms into UI.

In a React/Vue/Angular app, the typical flow is:

1. Client sends request to API
2. Server returns JSON
3. Client-side JavaScript processes JSON and renders DOM

In an HTMX app:

1. Client sends request to server
2. Server processes request, updates state, renders HTML
3. HTMX swaps the HTML into the page

The difference is that the server is doing the rendering, the business logic, and the state management — which is where those concerns arguably belong.

HTMX Core Attributes

HTMX extends HTML with a handful of key attributes:

A search-as-you-type example:

<input
  type="search"
  name="q"
  placeholder="Search..."
  hx-get="/search"
  hx-trigger="keyup changed delay:300ms"
  hx-target="#results"
/>

<div id="results"></div>

Every 300ms after the user stops typing, HTMX sends a GET request to /search?q=<value> and replaces #results with the response. The server renders a <ul> of results and returns that HTML fragment.

What HTMX Does Well

Form-heavy applications: Traditional forms, validation, multi-step wizards — HTMX handles these naturally. The server renders the next step or validation errors as HTML, HTMX swaps them in.

Dashboards with live data: With HTMX's Server-Sent Events support, you can push real-time updates from the server without writing WebSocket client code.

Progressive enhancement: hx-boost converts standard <a> links and <form> elements to AJAX requests, giving you SPA-like navigation with zero markup changes. Works without JavaScript too (degrades gracefully).

Admin panels and internal tools: Where the complexity of a React app isn't justified by the user base.

Server-side rendering with any language: HTMX works with any backend — Python/Django, Ruby/Rails, Go, Node.js, PHP. Your server just needs to render HTML. This is a meaningful advantage for teams that don't want their backend dictated by JavaScript ecosystem concerns.

What HTMX Doesn't Do Well

Complex client-side state: If you need a rich interactive UI — drag-and-drop, complex form interactions, real-time collaborative editing — HTMX starts to feel like fighting the model. The server roundtrip for every interaction adds latency.

Offline functionality: HTMX requires a server. Progressive Web Apps with offline support need client-side data and rendering.

Existing React codebases: If you have a React app, migrating to HTMX is a significant rewrite. There's no incremental adoption path (unlike something like React → Preact).

Heavy data visualization: Complex charts, maps, and visualizations still need JavaScript libraries. HTMX doesn't eliminate JavaScript — it reduces how much you need to write for basic interactivity.

HTMX vs. React vs. Astro

These aren't mutually exclusive. Astro can use HTMX for dynamic components. A Next.js app might use HTMX for a subset of server-rendered pages.

Getting Started

Add HTMX to any page:

<script src="https://unpkg.com/htmx.org@2/dist/htmx.min.js"></script>

Or install via npm:

npm install htmx.org

Then start adding hx-* attributes to your HTML. The HTMX documentation is unusually well-written and includes a good set of examples.

The Simplicity Argument

The strongest case for HTMX isn't performance or specific features — it's simplicity.

A typical React CRUD application involves: React components, state management (Zustand, Redux, or Context), an API client, TypeScript types for every API response, and often a separate backend with its own API. This is a lot of moving parts.

The equivalent HTMX application involves: your server-side language (rendering HTML), and HTML with HTMX attributes. No client-side state management. No API layer (you return HTML, not JSON). No serialization/deserialization.

For teams building internal tools, admin panels, or applications where developer experience matters more than runtime performance at scale, this simplicity is a real advantage.

The tradeoff is that your server does more work (rendering full HTML responses vs. JSON) and your UI is less rich than a full React application. For many use cases, that's a worthwhile tradeoff.

When to Choose HTMX

Choose HTMX when:

• You're building a form-heavy web application (CRUD, admin, data entry)
• Your team is stronger in server-side languages than JavaScript frontend
• You want minimal JavaScript complexity
• You're starting a new project that doesn't need the richness of a full SPA
• You're working with a server-side framework (Django, Rails, Laravel) that already handles templating

Skip HTMX when:

• You're building a rich interactive application (design tools, collaborative editing, complex dashboards)
• Your team is heavily invested in React
• You need offline support
• You're adding dynamic behavior to an existing SPA

Want more developer tooling insights? Subscribe to DevTools Guide — a weekly newsletter for TypeScript and JavaScript developers.